1. <div id="a8tz1"><tr id="a8tz1"><kbd id="a8tz1"></kbd></tr></div>

        1. [1]万金彬,李庆华,白松涛.页岩气储层测井评价及进展[J].测井技术,2012,36(05):441-447.
           WAN Jinbin,LI Qinghua,BAI Songtao.Welllogging Evaluation in Shale Gas Reservoir and Its Advances[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):441-447.
          点击复制

          页岩气储层测井评价及进展()
          分享到:

          《测井技术》[ISSN:1004-1338/CN:61-1223/TE]

          卷:
          第36卷
          期数:
          2012年05期
          页码:
          441-447
          栏目:
          综述
          出版日期:
          2012-10-31

          文章信息/Info

          Title:
          Welllogging Evaluation in Shale Gas Reservoir and Its Advances
          作者:
          万金彬李庆华白松涛
          中国石油集团测井有限公司油气评价中心, 陕西 西安 710077
          Author(s):
          WAN Jinbin LI Qinghua BAI Songtao
          Oil and Gas Evaluation Center, China Petroleum Logging CO. LTD., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710077, China
          关键词:
          测井评价 页岩气储层 总有机碳 成熟度指数 裂缝识别 样本数据库
          Keywords:
          log evaluation shale gas reservoir total organic carbon (TOC) maturity index (MI) fracture
          分类号:
          P631.84
          文献标志码:
          A
          摘要:
          页岩基岩孔隙度和渗透率极低,90%以?#31995;?#39029;岩气储层需要经过压裂改造才能生产。根据2008年以来与页岩气储层测井评价有关的大量文献,综述了页岩气储层的地质特点,简介了页岩气储层岩心分析技术进展和适用的测井方法。概括给出了适用条件下的测井总有机碳、成熟度指数、岩石力学参数计算方法和裂缝评价方法。探讨了页岩气储层测井评价存在的问题及未来研究可行的发展方向,认为有必要建立信息全面的产气页岩典型样本数据库。
          Abstract:
          Shale gas reservoir log evaluation differs from that of conventional gas reservoir because over 90% of shale gas reservoirs need fracturing and the shale bed rock has ultra low porosity and permeability. On the basis of researches on a great number of articles about shale gas reservoir log evaluations since 2008, summarized are geologic characteristics of shale gas reservoir, and introduced are the advances of the reservoir core sample analysis technology and suitable logging methods in shale gas reservoirs. Provided are not only the calculation methods of log total organic carbon (TOC), maturity index (MI) and the parameters of rock mechanical properties, but also the fracture evaluation method. Discussed are existing problems in shale gas reservoir log evaluation, and provided is the feasible developing direction in future research. It is believed that it is necessary to build a full information sample database for shale gas reservoir.

          参考文献/References:

          [1]刘洪林,王莉,王红岩,等. 中国页岩气勘探开发适用技术探讨[J]. 油气井测试,2009,18(4):6871.
          [2]张金川,汪中余,聂海宽,等. 页岩气及其勘探研究意义[J]. 现代地质,2008,22(4):640646.
          [3]潘仁芳,伍媛,宋争. 页岩气勘探的地球化学指标及测井分析方法初探[J]. 中国石油勘探,2009(3):69.
          [4]董大忠,程克明,王世谦,等. 页岩气?#35797;?#35780;价方法及其在四川盆地的应用[J]. 天然气工业,2009,29(5):3339.
          [5]蒲泊伶,包书景,王毅,等. 页岩气成藏条件分析——以美国页岩气盆地为例[J]. 石油地质与工程,2008,22(3):3336.
          [6]Russell W Spears, David Dudus, Andrew Foulds, et al. Shale Gas Core Analysis: Strategies for Normalizing Between Laboratories and a Clear Need for Standard Materials[C]∥ SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, A, Colorado: 2011.
          [7]Charlers Boyer, John Kieschnick Roberto, SuarezRivera Richard E,et al. 页岩气藏?#30446;?#37319;[J]. 油田新技术,2006年秋季刊:1831.
          [8]Darrell L. Eubanks. Application of Resistivity Borehole Image Analysis in Unconventional Gas Reservoir Field Development [C]∥ SPWLA 49th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, XX, Edinburgh: 2008.
          [9]Dan Buller, Suparman FNU, Shan Kwong. A Novel Approach to Shalegas Evaluation Using a Casedhole Pulsed Neutron Tool[C]∥ SPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, IIII, Perth: 2010.
          [10]Mark A Miller, Creties Jenkins et al. Applying Innovative Production Modeling Techniques to Quantify Fracture Characteristics, Reservoir Properties, and Well Performance in Shale Gas Reservoirs[C]∥SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, 2010(10), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA:1214.
          [11]Paul Boonen, Zhipeng Liu, Libai Xu, et al. Application of Triple Neutron Porosity Measurements in Gas Shales and Shaly Sands[C]∥ SPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, JJJJ, Perth: 2010.
          [12]Hamed Soroush, Vamegh Rasouli, Behzad Tokhmechi.A Data Processing Algorithm Proposed for Identification of Breakout Zones in TightforMations: A case Study in Barnett Gas Shale[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2010(74):154162.
          [13]Philippe Marouby, Zoya Heidari, Carlos TorresVerdin. Assessment of Insitu Elastic Properties of HydrocarbonBearing Shale with the Joint Quantitative Interpretation of Sonic, Nuclear and Resistivity Logs[C]∥ SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, O, Colorado: 2011.
          [14]Zoya Heidari, Carlos TorresVerdin. Quantitative Method for Estimating Total Organic Carbon and Porosity and for Diagnosing Mineral Constituents from Well Logs in Shalegas Formations[C]∥ SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, Q, Colorado: 2011.
          [15]Shabro V, TorresVerdí Cn, Javadpour F. Numerical Simulation of Shalegas Production: from Porescale Modeling of Slipflow, Knudsen Diffusion, and Langmuir Desorption to Reservoir Modeling of Compressible Fluid [C]∥North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA:1416,6,2011.
          [16]Sinha S, Braun E.M, Passey Q.R, et al. Advances in Measurement Standards and Flow Properties Measurements for Tight Rocks such as Shales [C]∥PE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, 2012(3), Vienna, Austria:2022.
          [17]Hank Zhao, Natalie B, BradCurtis. Thermal Maturity of the Barnett Shale Determined from Welllog Analysis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):535549.
          [18]Naniel F Coope, Terrence H Quinn, Elton Frost Jr, et al. A Rock Model for Shale Gas and Its Application Using Magnetic Resonance and Conventional LWD Logs[C]∥ SPWLA 50th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, CCCC, Texas: 2009.
          [19]Dariusz Strpoc′, Maria Mastalerz, Arndt Schimmelmann, et al.Geochemical Constraints on the Origin and Volume of Gas in the New Albany Shale (DevonianMississippian),eastern Illinois Basin [J].AAPG Bulletin, 2010,94(11):17131740.
          [20]Heidari Sureshjani M, Gerami S. A New Model for Modern ProductionDecline Analysis of Gas/Condensate Reservoirs[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2011, 50(7/8): 1423.
          [21]Dan Buller, Simon Hughes, Jennifer Market. et al. Petrophysical Evaluation for Enhancing Hydraulic Stimulation in Horizontal Shale Gas Wells [ C] ∥ SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy:1922,9,2012.
          [22]Rick Rickman, Mike Mullen, Erik Petre. et al. A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays are not Clones of the Barnett Shale[C]∥ SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA:2124,8,2008.
          [23]Gatens, J M, Harrison , C W, et al.Insitu Stress Tests and Acoustic Logs Determine Mechanical Propertries and Stress Profiles in the Devonian Shales[J]∥ SPE Formation Evaluation. 1990(9): 248254 .
          [24]Doug Patterson, Natasa Mekic, Alexei Bolshakov, et al. Unconventional Reservoir Fracture Evaluation Utilizing Deep Shearwave Imaging[C]∥ SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, M, Colorado: 2011.

          相似文献/References:

          [1]张凤生,司马立强,赵冉,等.塔河油田储层裂缝测井识别和有效性评价[J].测井技术,2012,36(03):261.
           ZHANG Fengsheng,SIMA Liqiang,ZHAO Ran,et al.Log Identification and Effectiveness Evaluation on Reservoir Fractures in Tahe Oilfield[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):261.
          [2]冯春珍,林伟川,成志刚,等.低渗透储层测井分类和产能预测技术[J].测井技术,2012,36(03):308.
           FENG Chunzhen,LIN Weichuan,CHENG Zhigang,et al.Reservoir Classification and Productivity Forecasting Method for Low Prorosity and Permeability Reservoir with Log Data[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):308.
          [3]葛祥,?#26410;?#20142;,朱小红,等.川东北地区陆相地层井壁稳定性测井分析[J].测井技术,2012,36(02):164.
           GE Xiang,HE Chuanliang,ZHU Xiaohong,et al.Borehole Stability Logging Analysis in Terrestrial Formation in Northeastern Sichuan[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):164.
          [4]胡瑞波,常?#27850;?张文胜,等.歧口凹陷湖相碳酸盐岩储层岩性识别及储集类型研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(02):179.
           HU Ruibo,CHANG Jingchun,ZHAN Wensheng,et al.On Lithology Identification of Limnetic Facies Carbonate Reservoir in Qikou Sag and Its Reservoir Types[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):179.
          [5]章海宁,张翔,李国瑛,等.三塘湖盆地火山岩储层测井定量评价方法[J].测井技术,2012,36(01):24.
           ZHANG Haining,ZHANG Xiang,LI Guoying,et al.Quantitative Log Evaluation Method for Volcanic Reservoir in Santanghu Basin[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):24.
          [6]肖承文.塔里木盆地高压气藏出砂测井评价方法研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(01):41.
           XIAO Chengwen.On Sand Production Log Evaluation of Highpressure Gas Reservoir in Tarim Basin[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):41.
          [7]张丽华,潘保芝,庄华,等.低孔隙度低渗透率储层压裂后产能测井预测方法研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(01):101.
           ZHANG Lihua,PAN Baozhi,ZHUANG Hua,et al.Productivity Log Forecasting Method for Postfrac Reservoir with Low Porosity and Low Permeability[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):101.
          [8]赵江青,匡立春,刘应,等.非均质储层孔喉结构的测井评价方法[J].测井技术,1998,22(S1):60.
          [9]李虎,范宜仁,丛云海,等.基于改进SADE算法的神经网络预测储层物性[J].测井技术,2012,36(06):585.
           LI Hu,FAN Yiren,CONG Yunhai,et al.A New Method Predicting Reservoir Properties with Neural Network Based on SADE Algorithm[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(05):585.
          [10]罗景美,?#29575;?#23267;,李爱华,等.测井新技术在桩西地区生产井中的应用[J].测井技术,2003,27(S1):5.
           Luo Jingmei,Hao Shuyan,Li Aihua. et al...Applications of New Logging Technologies in Production Wells in Zhuangxi Region[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2003,27(05):5.
          [11]石文睿,张超谟,张占松,等.涪陵页岩气田焦石坝页岩气储层含气量测井评价[J].测井技术,2015,39(03):357.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2015.03.019]
           SHI Wenrui,ZHANG Chaomo,ZHANG Zhansong,et al.Log Evaluation of Gas Content from Jiaoshiba Shale Gas Reservoir in Fuling Gas Field[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2015,39(05):357.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2015.03.019]

          备注/Memo

          备注/Memo:
          作者简介: 万金彬,男,1971年生,高级工程师,从事测井解释评价及测井解释方法研究工作。
          更新日期/Last Update: 2012-10-20
          11选五开奖结果